![]() In denying the tenancy, is the defendant acting in collusion with Sittampalam? ![]() (1) is the defendant the tenant of the premises in suit ? The Defendant-Appellant filed answer admitting his residence in partof the said premises but denying his occupation stating that he had been payingrent as an agent of Sittampalam and not as the tenant of the saidPlaintiffs-Respondents. duly filed this action to terminate the tenancy of the Defendant-Appellant. Landlord and tenant - Ejectment of tenant - Denial of tenancy - Whetherpremises reasonably required – Section 22 of the Rent Act. Provincial Council & Local Authorities StatutesĠ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |